Message From the Executive Director É
Click to view index of columns
Earlier this fall, I
began a column, which attempted to address philosophies we hold at the Athletic
Union, or outline procedures we utilize for everything from tournament
assignments to the selection process for state tournament hosts. These
columns were born from a need and desire to communicate better with all
stakeholders of our interscholastic athletic programs.
The next step in this
process is development of a monthly electronic newsletter, which debuts this
month. While you can read it on our web site around the first of each
month, we now have the capability of delivering a monthly electronic version to
your mailbox. Click HERE to add your email address to our database to receive
this monthly newsletter (Be sure to put ÒsubscribeÓ in the subject box).
This column will be one feature of that monthly newsletter. We are
also developing an on-line calendar for all unified activity events that you
can review through this newsletter. Feel free to contact me, or Jason
Eslinger, the newsletter editor, to offer suggestions for content that you feel
would best serve those interested in interscholastic athletics.
In November, my
column dealt specifically with conduct counts, and the guidelines put in place
last year by the four activity associations (IGHSAU, IHSAA, IHSSA –
speech & debate, IHSMA – music) for spectator conduct at our
events. In general, I would rate the behavior of our coaches and
participants as exceptional, and the behavior of spectators as generally
exceptional. However, like everything, one coach whose emotions overtake
good judgment can cause all coaches a black eye. Likewise, one or two
fans in the stands can impact the reputation and image of an entire community
and its schools. Thus, rules were put in place to regulate the small
percentage of fans that have trouble acting appropriately at our events.
All too often we
encounter fans that have lost perspective – the reality of why we even
play sports. The sole objective behind the fact schools spend educational
dollars to sponsor interscholastic athletics is to offer an educational
opportunity outside the classroom, and help prepare students to be successful
throughout their adult lives. As I wrote in an earlier message, our
purpose is not to prepare students to earn a college scholarship, or to garner
all-state recognition. In fact, if the objective of interscholastic
athletics changes away from education and development of the student, then we
must re-evaluate the merit in spending educational dollars to fund
interscholastic competition.
When someone loses
perspective, it impacts their judgment. We go after coaches because our
kids donÕt play enough, or our teams donÕt win enough. Yet, IÕve never
heard of anyone looking to replace a coach because that coach wasnÕt providing
educational benefit to his/her student participants. We scream at
officials, threatening them with bodily harm, yet such an act would be
considered criminal if it happened in your workplace.
What has prompted the
loss of perspective? What has changed so much over time that the four
activity organizations were prompted to draft guidelines for spectator
behavior?
When I graduated from
LDF High School in 1984, other than little league baseball starting at age 9 or
10, the first opportunity I had to participate was in my school-based junior
high programs. The first real experience of competition for my parents
and me was in this educational setting. Today my own daughters, ages 7
and 11, have been playing various sports since age 4. The purpose of
these teams wasnÕt educational. The purpose IÕve observed has been for
fun (at times, this gets lost), and skill development. Peers of my 11
year old have been split into ÒeliteÓ groups that travel through the state and
around the Midwest. (Sorry, but in my own mind, no one is ÒeliteÓ at age
10) The purpose of these teams is skill development.
By the time those
kids get into high school, one of two things has happened. Either the
kids have been burned out, or those who werenÕt ÒeliteÓ enough at age 10 have
quit sports and moved onto something else. Either way, those kids are not
taking part in one of the greatest opportunities we can offer as a part of their
educational development.
Others do stay active
into the high school program. Families have spent hundreds if not
thousands of dollars in preparation for the inevitable college
scholarship. When kids donÕt succeed at a level that is satisfactory to
the parents, it becomes the fault of the officials, the coaches or even the
school administration. Sadly, too many parents see their kids enter high
school athletics and expect a return on investment for the time and money spent
in youth programs.
While youth sports
are certainly not solely to blame for the ills in our high school gyms, it is
harder and harder to re-instate the proper perspective in the parentsÕ minds
when their child enters school programs.
The attention given
interscholastic athletics is both a blessing and a curse. A blessing from
the standpoint that activity participation can be every bit as important as the
classroom to a studentÕs overall development. The credibility, respect
and attention activities receive make it easier to drive students in those
programs. However, the curse comes as we overemphasize the value of
activities, to the point the value can only become realized when success is
achieved.
While we have
established Conduct Counts guidelines to regulate spectator behavior, there are
three simple philosophies that, when followed, will ensure students get the
most out of our programs, and allow us to take down Conduct Counts posters
because spectator issues will become a thing of the past.
1)
Never refer to high school students who
participate in athletics as Òstudent-athletes.Ó That is a term that
should be reserved for collegiate programs. In our programs, everyone is
a student – nothing more, nothing less.
2)
Cheer for and support every student who
participates, including those who do not share your last name. Students
make an important decision when they choose to participate in interscholastic
athletics. There are a number of things they could choose to be involved
with that have no educational benefit. When they choose to enhance their
education, they deserve your support.
3)
Ask your coaches what you can do FOR the
program, not TO it. Just like you may volunteer to help out the school
PTA or booster club, offer to help your coaches. In the end, you will
provide a benefit to your child, as well as everyone else on the team, though
your efforts. You cannot judge the success of a coach by the wins and
losses. The only way to judge a coach is 10 years down the line, when you
see the person your child has become as an adult, and how the influence of that
coach helped shape your son or daughter.
I regularly get calls
from parents who want to fire a coach or allege misconduct because another
ÒfavoredÓ student plays. Parents have pulled their kids out of school and
open-enrolled for the last year or two of high school because of playing time
– with no consideration to how that impacts their total education.
WeÕve even had more than a handful of parents actually file for divorce and re-assign
custody of their child so eligibility can be established immediately in another
district.
In the end, it comes
down to goals and objectives. It is the ultimate objective we must keep
in perspective as we strive for goals along the way. We want to recognize
those who are successful in athletics just as we recognize those who succeed in
the classroom through National Honor Society or valedictorian awards. All
tournament awards and championship trophies are means to do just this.
But these awards are goals for every participant and can be objectives for
none. Making the team, being a starter, all-stater or playing at the next
level are great goals as well. But, we donÕt teach in our classrooms with
the National Honor Society as the defining objective of an
education. Similarly we canÕt teach in the athletic arena with a
college scholarship as the defining objective of an education.